| Measurement |
Description |
Measurement Unit |
Interpretation |
| NO_OF_DISK |
Indicates the number of disks pooled in this storage pool. |
Number |
The detailed diagnosis of this measure lists the ID of the disk, status of the disk and host name. |
| DISK_USAGE |
Indicates the total amount of physical storage space used by the disks in this storage pool. |
GB |
|
| STR_CAPACITY |
Indicates the amount of space in the cluster that is available to this storage pool. |
GB |
Where there are multiple storage pools, you can compare the value of this measure across the pools to know which pool has been sized with the maximum storage space. |
| STR_USAGE |
Indicates the total amount of physical storage space used in this storage pool. |
GB |
A consistent increase in the value of this measure is indicative of rapid usage of space in the pool, which could lead to a storage space contention. |
| STR_FREE |
Indicates the total amount of physical storage space that is unused in this pool. |
GB |
Ideally, the value of this measure should be high. A very low value for this measure could indicate that the pool is running short of storage resources and may require expansion. |
| STR_USAGE_PERC |
Indicates the percentage of physical storage space used in this storage pool. |
Percent |
A value close to 100% is a cause for concern as it indicates a probable contention for storage space on the pool. You may want to consider resizing the pool to make sure that VM operations continue uninterrupted. |
| STR_FREE_PERC |
Indicates the percentage of physical storage space that is unused in this storage pool. |
Percent |
A value less than 50% is a cause for concern as it indicates a probable contention for storage space on the pool. You may want to consider resizing the pool to make sure that VM operations continue uninterrupted. |
| LOGICAL_USAGE |
Indicates the total amount of logical storage space used in this storage pool. |
GB |
|
| IO_LATENCY |
Indicates the average I/O latency for physical disk requests in this storage pool. |
Seconds |
Ideally, the value of this measure should be very low. A high value or a steady increase in this value could indicate an I/O processing bottleneck on the pool. In such a case, compare the value of the READ_IO_LATENCY and WRITE_IO_LATENCY measures to figure out where the slowness is worst - when processing read requests? or write requests? |
| READ_IO_LATENCY |
Indicates the average time taken by this storage pool to process read I/O requests. |
Seconds |
If the IO_LATENCY measure reports an abnormally high value, then compare the value of these measures to figure out where the slowness is maximum - when processing read requests? or write requests? |
| WRITE_IO_LATENCY |
Indicates the average time taken by this storage pool to process write I/O requests. |
Seconds |
| IO_BANDWIDTH |
Indicates the bandwidth per second used by this storage pool when processing I/O requests. |
KB/Sec |
A high value for this measure denotes that the storage pool is processing bandwidth-intensive I/O. In such situations, you may want to compare the value of the READIO_BWIDTH and WRITEIO_BWIDTH measures to know what type of I/O requests are truly contributing to the excessive bandwidth consumptions - read requests? or write requests? |
| READIO_BWIDTH |
Indicates the bandwidth per second used by this storage pool when processing read I/O requests. |
KB/Sec |
If the value of the IO_BANDWIDTH measure is high, then you may want to compare the values of these measures to know what type of I/O requests are truly contributing to the excessive bandwidth consumption - read requests? or write requests? |
| WRITEIO_BWIDTH |
Indicates the bandwidth per second used by this storage pool when processing write I/O requests. |
KB/Sec |
| IOPS |
Indicates the number of I/O operations performed currently on this storage pool. |
Number |
This measure is a good indicator of the level of I/O activity on the storage pool. A steady and significant increase in the value of this measure could indicate a potential I/O overload. In such situations, you may want to compare the value of the READ_IOPS and WRITE_IOPS measures of the storage pool to know what type of IO operations are contributing to the overload. |
| READ_IOPS |
Indicates the number of read I/O operations performed currently on this storage pool. |
Number |
If the value of the IOPS measure is unusually high, then compare the value of these measures for that storage pool to know what is contributing to the unusual I/O activity levels - read requests? or write requests? |
| WRITE_IOPS |
Indicates the number of write I/O operations performed currently on this storage pool. |
Number |
| TRANS_USAGE |
Indicates the amount of actual usage of storage (i.e., usage after compression and deduplication) in the storage pool. |
GB |
The Nutanix platform incorporates a wide range of storage optimization technologies that work in concert to make efficient use of available capacity for any workload. Compression and Deduplication are two such technologies.
Compression can be inline or offline. Inline compression will compress sequential streams of data or large I/O sizes (>64K) in memory before it is written to the Extent Store. Offline compression will initially write the data as normal (in an un-compressed state) and then leverage the Curator framework to compress the data cluster wide.
The Elastic Dedupe Engine in Nutanix allows for data deduplication in the capacity (Extent Store) and performance (Unified Cache) tiers. Streams of data are fingerprinted during ingest using a SHA-1 hash at a 16K granularity. This fingerprint is only done on data ingest and is then stored persistently as part of the written block's metadata. For duplicate data that can be deduplicated in the capacity tier, the data does not need to be scanned or re-read, essentially duplicate copies can be removed.
The true effectiveness of these optimization methodologies can be measured by determining how much storage space in the pool these technologies helped save. By comparing the value of this measure with the value of the Storage usage measure of the pool, you should be able to make an accurate assessment of the effectiveness of these methodologies. |